Friday, September 27, 2013

The Balancing Act


There was a movie that came out within the past few years titled "The Invention of Lying." Ricky Gervais (the British Michael of The Office) plays a character who invents the idea of lying in a world where it has never previously existed. Yes, a goofy concept for a movie (I don't recommend seeing it), but its curious to think of the good that lying imparted on the characters in the film. Although lying is traditionally believed to bring bad, maybe there are instances in which lying is for good. No, I'm not talking about if a girl asks you if she "looks fat in this dress" and you say no...lying. Maybe there is a unique balance between deception and the truth that allows people to stay sane. This relationship between deception and truth is extremely important in the film "Moon".
A centerpiece of the film is a computer. It’s the only form of human “communication” that Sam has, although it is not in real time. Sam is told that real time communication is not possible because a satellite is jammed. Deliberate deception—we later see GERTY using the computer to communicate with Lunar Industries down on Earth after Sam1 was in an accident. Why the lie? Perhaps because Sam is merely a clone and the woman who he believes to be his wife is not. Therefore, he would really have no one to communicate with as a clone. In any case, the importance of the matter is the computer acts as a deceptive piece in the film, constantly hiding information from Sam. Another instance of computer fraud occurs towards the beginning of the movie when you see Sam speaking with his “wife.” As he is listening to her, a weird glitch occurs in the video. It is outwardly assumed that someone is trying to keep what she is saying away from Sam. Another deceptive act on behalf of Lunar Industries with reference to the computer.
Now, back to the importance of balance. With deception must be a glimmer of hope that there is some truth in the world. Unfortunately for Sam, there isn’t much of it on the moon. Actually, it seems that the only non-deceptive thing in Sam’s life are the harvesters. Since Sam is, in essence, a robot, and lives with a bunch of robots and machines, it is easy to compare the harvesters to truthful “friends”. They don’t lie to him—they say when they have achieved enough He3 for him to perform his duties. They are consistent in their duties of scraping the moon of its clean energy sources. They bring the good news to Sam, allowing him to have a job, providing life for the millions of people on Earth. And in the end, they finally let the truth come out by allowing a signal to reach the moon for Sam3 (and beyond) to communicate with Earth. Although sad to think that they may be the only non-deceptive devices in the movie, they allow for this graceful balancing act to occur.
Ultimately, it is this precious balance between bringing the truth and bringing about deception that is important in the film “Moon”. Deception from the computer is an important piece of the film because it allows the clones to learn about themselves and their status as clones and fight back against Lunar Industries. It also is good to have something in the film that is not so illusive. The straightforward nature of the harvesters gives Sam the opportunity to trust in something. This balancing act is what allows the Sam’s to survive and ultimately release themselves from the bonds of the moon.




1 comment:

  1. It's interesting that you've pointed out the concepts of deception and truth. In my blog, I argued that the actor's behavior and his setting act together to convey the film's meaning (whichever that may be). However, it's interesting to acknowledge how important the idea of deception is in Moon. Something that I deemed interesting was the possibility of Sam's reaction to the deception around him. And I think that his reactions toward the harvesters illustrates my point. Like you said, the only non-deceptive thing in Sam's life are the harvesters. The harvesters, part of the setting, interacts with the actors behavior yield a consistent meaning (at least, of some sort) in this film .

    ReplyDelete